The truth in a bubble the end of ‘audience democracy’ and the rise of ‘bubble democracy’.
Este artículo sostiene que el así llamado fenómeno de la “posverdad” también depende de las características del nuevo sistema de comunicación “híbrido”. La tesis es que este nuevo escenario es sustancialmente diferente a lo de la “democracia partidária”, protagonista de una parte significativa del s...
Saved in:
| Institution: | Universidad Católica de Colombia |
|---|---|
| Main Author: | |
| Format: | Artículo de revista |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Soft Power
2019-07-01
|
| Subjects: | |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| id |
oai:repository.ucatolica.edu.co:10983-29971 |
|---|---|
| recordtype |
dspace |
| spelling |
Palano , Damiano 2019-07-01T00:00:00Z 2019-07-01T00:00:00Z 2019-07-01 Este artículo sostiene que el así llamado fenómeno de la “posverdad” también depende de las características del nuevo sistema de comunicación “híbrido”. La tesis es que este nuevo escenario es sustancialmente diferente a lo de la “democracia partidária”, protagonista de una parte significativa del siglo XX, y de la “democracia de audiencias”, definida por Bernard Manin a mediados de los noventa. La aparición de nuevos medios de comunicación tiene una serie de consecuencias, entre ellas la fragmentación de la audiencia en una pluralidad de segmentos auto-referenciales, “burbujas” políticamente polarizadas, desprovistas, por lo menos potencialmente, de una esfera comunicativa común. Teniendo en cuenta estos desarrollos, el artículo trata de construir el “tipo ideal” de “democracia de burbujas”, marcada por la desconfianza de las instituciones, fragmentación de la audiencia, desintermediación, tendencia a la homofilia, y la polarización. This article sustains that the so-called ‘post-truth’ phenomenon also depends on the characteristics of the new ‘hybrid’ communicative scenario. The thesis is that this new scenario is substantially different from that of the ‘party democracy’, protagonist of significant part of the twentieth century, and from that of the ‘audience democracy’, defined by Bernard Manin in the mid-nineties. The emergence of new media entails a series of consequences, including the fragmentation of the audience into a plurality of self-referential segments, politically polarized ‘bubbles’, devoid, at least potentially, of a common communicative sphere. Taking into account such developments, the article seeks to construct the ‘ideal type’ of a ‘bubble democracy’, marked by the mistrust of institutions, fragmentation of the audience, disintermediation, homophilic tendencies, and polarization. application/pdf 10.14718/SoftPower.2019.6.2.3 2539-2239 2389-8232 https://doi.org/10.14718/SoftPower.2019.6.2.3 eng Soft Power https://editorial.ucatolica.edu.co/index.php/SoftP/article/download/3561/3261 Núm. 12 , Año 2019 :Julio - Diciembre 53 12 36 6 Soft Power Anagnostopoulos A. et al. (2016), Viral misinformation: the role of homophily and virality, Epj Special Topics, 355-356. Bakshy E. –Messing S. –Adamic L.A. (2015), Exposure to Ideologically Diverse News and Opinion on Facebook, Science, 348, 1130-1132. Bartlett J. (2018), The People Vs Tech. How the internet is killing democracy (and how we save it). London: Ebury Press. Bessi A. et al. (2015a), Science vs. conspiracy: Collective narratives in the age of Misinformation, PLoS ONE, 10(2), retrived from: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0118093 Bessi A, et al. (2015b) Trend of Narratives in the Age of Misinformation. PLoS ONE 10(8). Retrived from: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0134641 Campbell J. (2018), Polarized. Making Sense of a Divided America. Princeton (N.Y), Princeton University Press. Dalton J. & Weldon S., (2007), Partisanship and Party System Institutionalization, Party Politics, 2, 179-196. Del Vicario M. et al. (2016), The Spreading of Misinformation Online, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 3, 554-559. Del Vicario M. et al. (2017), Mapping Social Dynamics on Facebook: The Brexit Debate, Social Network, 50, 6-16. Dick P. (1964), The Penultimate Truth. New York: Belmont Books. Dillhaut T.R., Brooks C.A., Gulati S. (2015), Detecting and Visualizing Filter Bubbles in Google and Bing, Proceedings of the Thirty-Third Annual Acm Conference: Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York, 1851-1856. Hannak A. et al. (2013), Measuring Personalization of Web Search, Proceedings of the Twenty-Second International Conference World Wide Web, New York, 527-528. Iyengar S. & Westwood S.J. (2015), Fear and Loathing across Party Lines: New Evidence on Group Polarization, American Journal of Political Science, 59(3), 690-707. Iyengar S., Sood G., Lelkes Y. (2012), Affect, Not Ideology: A Social Identity Perspective on Polarization, Public Opinion Quarterly, 76(3), 405–431. Jay M. (2010), The Virtues of Mendacity: On Lying in Politics. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press,. Kirchheimer O. (1966), The transformation of the West European Party Systems, in J. La Palombara & M. Weiner (Eds.), Political Parties and Political Development (177-200). Princeton (N.Y): Princeton University Press. Lorusso A.M. (2018), Postverità. Roma-Bari: Laterza. Manin B. (1997), Principles of representative government. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Mounk Y. (2018), The People vs. Democracy: Why Our Freedom is in Danger and How to Save It, Cambridge (Mass.): Harvard University Press. Palano D. (2017), Populismo. Milano: Bibliografica. Palano D. (2018), La maggioranza silenziosa. Chi vota la destra populista?, in C. Fumagalli & S. Puttini (Eds.), Destra (pp. 80-92), Milano: Fondazione Feltrinelli. Palano D. (2019a), The «Democratic Recession» and the Crisis of Liberalism, in A. Colombo & P. Magri (Eds.), The End of a World. The Decline of the Liberal Order (pp.37-50). Milano: Ledi. Palano D. (2019b), La fin du «public», la bubble democracy et la nouvelle polarisation, in C. Delsol & G. De Ligio (sous la direction de), La démocratie dans l’adversité. Enquête international (pp. 699-715), Paris: Cerf. Palano D. (2019c), La democrazia alla fine del pubblico. Sfiducia, frammentazione, polarizzazione: verso una bubble democracy?, Governare la paura, 35-92. Palano D., Bubble democracy. La fine del pubblico e la nuova polarizzazione, Brescia: Scholé. Pariser E. (2011), The Filter Bubble: How the New Personalized Web Is Changing What We Read and How We Think. New York: Penguin Press. Pew Reasearch Center (12 june 2014), Political Polarization in the American Publics, retrived from https://www.people-presso.org. Pierskalla J.H. & Hollenbach F.M. (2012), Technology and Collective Action: The Effect of Coverage on Political Violence in Africa, American Political Science Review, 3, 207-224. Prior M. (2017), Post-Broadcast Democracy. How Media Choice Increases Inequality in Political Involvement and Polarizes Elections, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Schkade D., Sunstein C.R., Hastie R. (2007), What Happened on Deliberation Day?, California Law Review, 3, 915-940. Sunstein C.R. (2002), The law of group polarization, The Journal of Political Philosophy, 2, 175-195. Sunstein C.R. (2017), #republic. Divided democracy in the age of social media. Princeton (N.Y.): Princeton University Press. Tarde G. (1901), L’opinion et la foule. Paris: Alcan. Damiano Palano - 2019 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ https://editorial.ucatolica.edu.co/index.php/SoftP/article/view/3561 Democracia de partido Democracia de audiencias Política de la posverdad Eco-cámaras Filtro de burbuja Polarización Medios de comunicación y democracia Party democracy Audience democracy Post-truth politics Echo-chambers Filter bubble Polarization Media and democracy The truth in a bubble the end of ‘audience democracy’ and the rise of ‘bubble democracy’. The truth in a bubble the end of ‘audience democracy’ and the rise of ‘bubble democracy’. Artículo de revista http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 Text info:eu-repo/semantics/article Journal article http://purl.org/redcol/resource_type/ARTREF info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Publication |
| institution |
Universidad Católica de Colombia |
| collection |
d_repository.ucatolica.edu.co-DSPACE |
| title |
The truth in a bubble the end of ‘audience democracy’ and the rise of ‘bubble democracy’. |
| spellingShingle |
The truth in a bubble the end of ‘audience democracy’ and the rise of ‘bubble democracy’. Palano , Damiano Palano , Damiano Democracia de partido Democracia de audiencias Política de la posverdad Eco-cámaras Filtro de burbuja Polarización Medios de comunicación y democracia Party democracy Audience democracy Post-truth politics Echo-chambers Filter bubble Polarization Media and democracy |
| title_short |
The truth in a bubble the end of ‘audience democracy’ and the rise of ‘bubble democracy’. |
| title_full |
The truth in a bubble the end of ‘audience democracy’ and the rise of ‘bubble democracy’. |
| title_fullStr |
The truth in a bubble the end of ‘audience democracy’ and the rise of ‘bubble democracy’. |
| title_full_unstemmed |
The truth in a bubble the end of ‘audience democracy’ and the rise of ‘bubble democracy’. |
| title_sort |
truth in a bubble the end of ‘audience democracy’ and the rise of ‘bubble democracy’. |
| author |
Palano , Damiano Palano , Damiano |
| author_facet |
Palano , Damiano Palano , Damiano |
| building |
Repositorio digital |
| topic |
Democracia de partido Democracia de audiencias Política de la posverdad Eco-cámaras Filtro de burbuja Polarización Medios de comunicación y democracia Party democracy Audience democracy Post-truth politics Echo-chambers Filter bubble Polarization Media and democracy |
| topic_facet |
Democracia de partido Democracia de audiencias Política de la posverdad Eco-cámaras Filtro de burbuja Polarización Medios de comunicación y democracia Party democracy Audience democracy Post-truth politics Echo-chambers Filter bubble Polarization Media and democracy |
| publishDate |
2019-07-01 |
| language |
English |
| publisher |
Soft Power |
| format |
Artículo de revista |
| description |
Este artículo sostiene que el así llamado fenómeno de la “posverdad” también depende de las características del nuevo sistema de comunicación “híbrido”. La tesis es que este nuevo escenario es sustancialmente diferente a lo de la “democracia partidária”, protagonista de una parte significativa del siglo XX, y de la “democracia de audiencias”, definida por Bernard Manin a mediados de los noventa. La aparición de nuevos medios de comunicación tiene una serie de consecuencias, entre ellas la fragmentación de la audiencia en una pluralidad de segmentos auto-referenciales, “burbujas” políticamente polarizadas, desprovistas, por lo menos potencialmente, de una esfera comunicativa común. Teniendo en cuenta estos desarrollos, el artículo trata de construir el “tipo ideal” de “democracia de burbujas”, marcada por la desconfianza de las instituciones, fragmentación de la audiencia, desintermediación, tendencia a la homofilia, y la polarización.
This article sustains that the so-called ‘post-truth’ phenomenon also depends on the characteristics of the new ‘hybrid’ communicative scenario. The thesis is that this new scenario is substantially different from that of the ‘party democracy’, protagonist of significant part of the twentieth century, and from that of the ‘audience democracy’, defined by Bernard Manin in the mid-nineties. The emergence of new media entails a series of consequences, including the fragmentation of the audience into a plurality of self-referential segments, politically polarized ‘bubbles’, devoid, at least potentially, of a common communicative sphere. Taking into account such developments, the article seeks to construct the ‘ideal type’ of a ‘bubble democracy’, marked by the mistrust of institutions, fragmentation of the audience, disintermediation, homophilic tendencies, and polarization.
|
| issn |
2389-8232 |
| _version_ |
1800826229568307200 |
| score |
11.346045 |
